- Home
- Alan Lloyd
Destroy Carthage Page 17
Destroy Carthage Read online
Page 17
Here, the first fierce fighting was encountered. But the rapidity of the Roman advance precluded organized resistance at this point, and Laelius stormed into the narrow, winding streets which characterized the Byrsa.
In such streets the mercenaries of Bomilcar had come to grief at the time of his abortive coup, pelted with missiles from the balconied roofs of the houses. Lacking outer windows, their doors barricaded, the faceless white dwellings were hard to enter. Where the hungry inmates had the strength to bear weapons, they now represented a new peril to Laelius. Circumspectly, he checked the charge, allowing his units to consolidate.
By evening, the Romans had reached the main square and were mopping-up in the rear. Scipio could be pleased with the day's work. The shell of the city had been breached; the docks and surrounding levels cleared. His army had unimpeded access in the southeast, but much yet depended on continued speed. Resistance, so far light, was likely to stiffen if the garrison and citizens of other quarters were given time to concentrate - especially since the heights of the city were still ahead.
Next morning, Scipio called forward fresh troops. Four thousand moved in through the captured walls. They were ebullient. Expectations of easy victory and long-awaited booty had soared overnight. Now, as they advanced among enticing symbols of affluence - rich temples, inviting houses, merchant banks - avarice overcame discipline and they ran amok.
Vital hours were lost in plundering. At one temple, dedicated to the Carthaginian Apollo, shrine and statue were hacked to pieces with swords in the grab for gold. A thousand talents of the stuff were carried off, so the story goes. By the time authority was restored, the day was wasted. Perhaps luckily for Scipio, the richest temple in Carthage, that of Eshmoun, presented an incentive for renewed attack. It stood a few hundred yards from the square, beyond climbing streets - streets now held in strength by the citizens. None could have forecast the cost of the journey. A week of savage fighting, involving all Scipio's reserves and frightful losses, was to pass before the Romans reached their objective.
28: The Salted Furrow
The total population of Carthage at the start of the siege, including freed slaves, has been estimated at 200,000, of whom about 30,000 bore arms in defence of the city. Some had perished in the fighting over three years; more by starvation. Perhaps 100,000, or thereabouts, occupied the densely urbanized Byrsa in the closing days.
Of these, most must have been enfeebled by hunger, though doubtless Hasdrubal's soldiers were fairly strong. The troops would have secured a priority claim to food. Their vigour could only delay the end. Without ships, or an exit by the isthmus, there was no escape. Either the inhabitants of the tenemented slopes surrendered at discretion, or they died fighting. Temperament dictated the second course.
Three roads led from the square to the vicinity of the temple of Eshmoun, each narrow, lined by multi-storey buildings. Characteristic of such Phoenician cities as Tyre and Motya, where scarcity of space encouraged vertical construction, the tall blocks had become fashionable in the Mediterranean. Occupied by armed men, they were veritable strongholds, every floor a fresh obstacle to assailants; the roofs becoming decks from which missiles could be hurled at troops in the streets below.
Appian recounted the fierce resistance from these tenements : 'The defenders showered projectiles on the Romans from six-storey buildings. Inside, the struggle continued to the roofs, and on planks across the gaps between them. Many people were pitched to the ground, or on to those fighting in the streets.'
The perilous procedure of assaulting rooftops by plank from nearby buildings indicates the difficulty of clearing the tenements from inside. It also suggests the reluctance of theRomans to take their chances among the plunging bolts and masonry in the streets. Often little more than alleys, the thoroughfares of the Byrsa were not difficult to barricade. Resistance faced the storming troops at every step.
Unnerved by suicidal opposition, by the chilling sights and sounds in the upper town, the legionaries recoiled. Repeatedly, they reformed and charged, to be driven back. Fresh legions were thrown in; exhausted and despondent men pulled out. Squads of Romans were assigned to haul the dead from the streets so that reinforcements would not be obstructed. A day passed; another dawned, and yet another. Through each, the defenders fought with mounting frenzy.
So pressing was Scipio's need for support that he brought his cavalry into the city, a recourse the more exceptional in view of the hilly ground.
According to Appian, the Roman general remained in personal command, without sleep, through the entire attack, snatching refreshment at irregular intervals. Carthaginian fury was matched by Roman savagery. In the buildings, the attackers slaughtered everyone they came across, tossing many of the disarmed to troops below, who impaled them on raised pikes. Dead and dying citizens were used to fill ditches across which advanced Scipio's transport.
'The body of one,' wrote Appian, 'was used to plug a hole.' The brutality, he thought, was 'not deliberate but in the heat of battle,' a distinction lost in the flow of his macabre lines:
At length Scipio ordered the whole region to be fired and the ruins flattened to make space for his advancing troops. As this was done, the falling buildings included the bodies of many (civilians) who had sought refuge on upper storeys and been burnt to death. Others, wounded and badly burnt, were still alive . . . dead and living were thrown together into pits, and it often happened that those not yet dead were crushed by the cavalry as it passed. On the sixth day, Scipio, pausing wearily on an 'elevated place,' surveyed the results of the most protracted and ferocious street battle recalled in ancient history. Behind him, the docks were in ashes. Once-rich temples and monuments had been torn apart in the scramble for loot. Smoking rubble replaced scores of former dwellings.
Everywhere, bodies festooned the tortured city: young and old, male and female - dumped uncovered in hollows, sprawled on footways, protruding amid crumbled masonry and charred beams.
The Roman losses are not recorded, but they must have been grievous. Street fighting is costly; against fanatical defenders, extremely so. Some idea of the carnage may be gained from the figure given for Carthage's survivors. On the seventh day, a group of men approached the Romans and offered the surrender of those still in the Byrsa if their lives were spared. Fifty thousand tragic people emerged - all who remained of garrison and populace save Hasdrubal and a small band barricaded in the temple of Eshmoun.
Of this last group, 900 strong, most were men who had deserted from the Roman side during the long siege. They were excluded from the terms of safe conduct; in no doubt of their grisly fate if captured.
Carthage was lost.
Withdrawing up the sixty steps to the great shrine, the doomed guard held first the precincts then, at last, the temple itself, climbing to the roof with its sweeping view of the blue gulf. Here, according to the sources available, they perished like Dido on a pyre of their own firing. Though not improbable, the burning of their refuge suspiciously echoes Scipio's earlier tactics.
At the last moment, Hasdrubal surrendered his person and his family.
A dramatic if dubious account of the incident told how the general's wife appeared briefly from the temple to compliment Scipio as a noble foe, reviling her husband as a coward and traitor before consigning herself and their children to the mounting flames. The story, blatantly Scipionic in bias, flies in the face of Hasdrubal's dauntless behaviour throughout the siege. That he declined to perish with Roman deserters could scarcely be held traitorous to Carthage.
Indeed, Scipio himself appears to have regarded his adversary with some respect, for not only was Hasdrubal allowed life and liberty but a peaceful seat of retirement in Italy. Most of the city's other survivors were sold as slaves.
Looting was now officially sanctioned, the rank-and-file permitted to retain the lesser treasures while important items were earmarked for the Roman government. Others were returned diplomatically to Sicily, from
which island many works of art had come to Carthage. Acragas regained her prized Bull of Phalaris; Segesta, a valued statue of Diana.
What remained of Carthage was burned, and the empty ruins flattened. Demolition complete, the ceremony of sowing salt in a furrow was enacted to symbolize eternal desolation. Scipio solemnly cursed the site. For ten days, as if loath to abandon its charred womb, a pall of smoke hung over the promontory - the last message from a city which, as Appian put it
had flourished for seven centuries since its foundation, which had ruled vast territories, seas and islands, as replete in arms, fleets, elephants and money as the greatest empires, but had surpassed them in daring and courage, for though disarmed and lacking ships it had withstood siege and famine for three years before meeting destruction . . .
Perhaps sensing the need for a touch of warmth in the victor, the writer added that Scipio 'is said to have wept' when the deed was done. The cause of the weeping is somewhat ambiguous. Seemingly reflecting on the mortality of cities and empires, as of life itself, Scipio turned to Polybius, who was with him, 'and took him by the hand, saying: "This is a glorious moment, Polybius, and yet I am strangely fearful that some day the same fate will befall my own country." '
It was the mark of a great man, in the opinion of Polybius, to be aware in success of the fickleness of fortune. Apprehension, not remorse, it seems induced the general's tears.
* * *
Thus, at a stroke as final in effect as a nuclear missile strike, an entire city, the centre of imperial government - indeed, of a civilization - was blotted from the earth's face. Since Zama, Carthage had languished as a martial power. In some ways she had been archaic, resistant to development; but, in others, virile still and ingenious, commercially adroit and regenerative. Rome built nothing to equal her in Africa for well over a century.
In 122 b.c., the Roman senate proposed to place a colony on the site. The enterprise, dedicated to Juno Caelestis, was doomed from the start by poor omens. It was said that hyenas tore up the boundary marks, recalling Scipio's solemn curse. In 46 b.c., Julius Caesar, pursuing the last of Pompey's supporters to North Africa, camped on the ruins. His decision to rebuild the city for Roman citizens was carried forward by Augustus, and in the pro-consulship of 14 to 13 b.c. the headquarters of the African province was moved there from Utica.
Strabo described the Roman Carthage - Colonia Julia Carthago - as among the foremost cities of the empire, but old suspicions persisted in Italy and the colonists were forbidden to replace the walls. After a chequered history of revolt and imperial pretension, during which Carthage became the centre of Christianity in Africa, the city was approached by the Vandals. The belated raising of walls proved a vain expense. Encountering feeble opposition, the Vandals sacked the colony, retaining a mere pirate stronghold there. In 553 a.d., as Colonia Justiniana Carthago, Carthage received 'a last ray of lustre' from the Byzantine general Belisarius who, defeating the Vandals, restored something of the city's former stature. It was shattered, ultimately, by the Arabs. The final devastation, ordered in 698 a.d. by Hasan ibn en-Noman, Gassanid governor of Egypt, left Carthage little more than a quarry from which the passing pageant of North Africa - Berbers, Bedouins, Turks, Spaniards, Italians, Germans, French - built its transient camps.
Of the small band of survivors from Punic Carthage knowledge is minimal. At the beginning of the ist century b.c., the Roman general Marius, proscribed by Sulla, found scattered groups of Carthaginian origin in the region of the deserted ruins. With pathetic unreality, they sent delegates to Mithridates, king of Pontus, on the Euxine, pledging support for his own fight against Rome.
Few can have escaped assimilation or servitude. It is true that Carthaginian culture lingered in the coastal cities of North Africa, and in Numidia, where the courts encouraged Punic skills, but its erosion was rapid. Customs and religion soon bore Rome's impress. Baal and Tanit (the latter at length identified with Dido) were Romanized by colonial society. The language of Carthage dwindled to dialect, traces of which St Augustine claimed to have recognized in the Libyan tongue for their likeness to Hebrew.
So extraordinary, even in antiquity, did it seem that Carthaginian civilization should have vanished virtually without trace that legend cast her, like Atlantis, as a lost realm, the repository of untold riches lying undisclosed. Nero cherished vain hopes of finding the fabled hoard. Later theorists envisaged the Carthaginians wandering like the tribes of Israel in search of a new home - even settling, improbably enough, in America.
In fact, Carthage's treasures had departed with Scipio. Of racial posterity, there was none. Her genius perished with the city from which it stemmed. For a state once unrivalled as the mercantile hub of the western world, doomsday had arrived 2,091 years before the atom-bomb.
Bibliographical Note
The list below is intended to give a brief indication of the scope for further reading, not as a catalogue of sources for students. In undertaking a book aimed at general interest, the author has drawn gratefully on the knowledge of a wide range of specialists without whose scholarship any such work would be impossible. In particular, he acknowledges his use as arbiters on the main topics covered as follows: (general) Stephane Gsell's masterly Histoire Ancienne de l'Afrique du Nord (vols i-iv), Paris 1913-29, and the Cambridge Ancient History; (Carthage and the western Greeks) Brian Warmington's fine book Carthage, London 1969; (the Punic Wars) Rome Against Carthage, London 1971, a concise and eminently readable modern study by T. A. Dorey and D. R. Dudley; (the city and its people) Daily Life in Carthage at the Time of Hannibal, English trans. London 1961, which upholds the fascination of all works by the great French authority Gilbert Picard, here with C. C. Picard.
Astin, A. Scipio Aemilianus. Oxford 1967.
Cary, M. & Warmington, E. H. The Ancient Explorers.
London 1929.
Cintas, P. Ceramique Tunique. Tunis 1950.
Contenau, G. La Civilisation Thenicienne. Paris 1926.
Dorey, T. A. & Dudley, D. R. Rome Against Carthage. London 1971.
Dunbabin, T. J. The Western Greeks. Oxford 1948.
Ehrenberg, V. Karthago. Leipzig 1927.
Foucher, L. Hadrumetum. Paris 1964.
Garcia y Bellido, A.
Fenicios y Cartagineses en Occidente. Madrid 1942.
Gavin de Beer, Sir. Hannibal's March. London 1967.
Gavin de Beer, Sir. Hannibal. London 1969.
Griffiths, G. Mercenaries of the Hellenistic World. Cambridge 1935.
Gsell, S. Histoire Ancienne de 1'Afrique du Nord (4 vols).
Paris 1913-29. Harden, D. B. The Phoenicians. London 1962.
Hawkes, J. & Woolley, Sir L. Prehistory and the Beginnings
of Civilization. London 1965.
Jullien, C. A. Histoire de 1'Afrique du Nord. Paris 1951.
Junkins, G. K. & Lewis, R. B. Carthaginian Gold and Electrum
Coins. London 1963.
Lapeyre, G. G. & Pellegrin, A. Carthage Punique. Paris 1942.
Lezine, A. Architecture Punique. Tunis 1961.
Mcdonald, A. H. Republican Rome. London 1966.
Moore, M. Carthage of the Phoenicians. London 1905.
Moscati, S. The World of the Phoenicians. London 1968.
Picard, G. Les Religions de l'Afrique Antique. Paris 1954.
Picard, G. Carthage (trans. Kochan M. & L.). London 1964.
Picard, G. & C., Daily Life in Carthage at the Time of Hannibal
(trans. Foster, A. E.). London 1961.
Scullard, H. H. Scipio Africanus in the Second Punic War. London 1930.
Scullard, H. H. A History of the Roman World 753-146 b.c. London 1969.
Scullard, H. H. Scipio Africanus, Soldier and Politician. London 1970.
Smith, R. B. Carthage and the Carthaginians. London 1897.
Thiel, J. Studies on the Growth of Roman Sea Power in Republican Times. Amsterdam 1954. Torr, C. Ancient Ships. New York 1964.
Toynbee, A. J. Hannibal's Legac
y (vol i). London 1965.
Vogt, J. (ed.) Rom und Karthago. Leipzig 1942.
Walbank, F. W. A Historical Commentary on Polybius (vol i).